Disney Needs to Learn from Archie Comics and Embrace the Gay Kiss

Archie's KevinIn an issue that will go on sale in August, Archie Comics will feature a kiss between two openly gay characters, Kevin and his boyfriend Devon. The gay kiss (because just like "gay marriage," it can't be just a "kiss," right?) shows how much the 72-year-old Archie Comics company has evolved amid America's cultural changes. Though the character of Archie snagged Bitch's Douchebag Decree for playing frenemies Betty and Veronica for saps, the comic book company made a good move by showing Riverdale resident Kevin Keller coming out as gay in a sold-out 2011 issue of its "Veronica" series.

The issue proved to be so popular that Kevin soon acquired his very own title series. With Kevin's much publicized wedding last winter also selling out, and his first "on-panel" kiss likely to continue the trend, one wonders other old-school entertainment companies will embrace the same-sex kiss. Specifically, it's high time for Disney to create its first-ever queer character and show a big gay kiss onscreen.

While there are a number of theories on the queer sexuality of various Disney icons, the entertainment giant has never featured an openly gay character in any of its major kids' films or cartoons, let alone present a (genuine) same-sex kiss. When Disney movies do allude to queer sexuality, including same-sex romance, this is usually in the context of a joke—a comical accident that leaves all parties disgusted and mortified.

While some might point to Disney's branding as "child-friendly" to explain its lack of representations of queer sexuality, a 2009 study by University of Michigan sociologists Karin Martin and Emily Kazyak found that far from being asexual, Disney films are steeped in sexuality: heterosexuality. The sociologists note that the plots of Disney films overwhelmingly revolve around heterosexual romance. Heterosexual love—including, of course, the highly esteemed heterosexual kiss—is presented as "exceptional, powerful, magical and transformative."

When Beauty and the Beast kiss, for example, the entire kingdom transforms from winter to spring. Snow melts, flowers bloom, and teacups, clocks, and candlesticks magically transform into humans. In The Little Mermaid, the so-called "kiss of true love," as deemed by Ursula, is so powerful that it is the only way Ariel can remain human. When Nala and Simba kiss in The Lion King, the act is so pivotal that it empowers Simba to change his mind and decide to fight to save his kingdom. In each of these moments, Disney teaches us that heterosexual love, particularly as expressed through the prized heterosexual kiss, is fantastical, transformational and sublime: It can revive a person from deathawaken someone from a deep sleepbring together cultures and create literal fireworks

Unfortunately, Disney cartoons teach us that the opposite is true when it comes to the queer kiss. Far from breaking spells and sparking fireworks, signs of queer sexuality generate only ridicule and disgust. When Timon and Pumbaa accidentally touch lips in The Lion King, both immediately appear stunned, horrified and even queasy. 

timon and pumba kissing

The opening scene of Princess and the Frog similarly remarks on the laughable nature of queer sexuality. When Tiana exits a street car, she leaves a would-be suitor to make an advance on the man who's taken her place (see the 1:00 mark), causing the man to frown with deep disapproval and the suitor to ashamedly shrink away.

Other Disney films are similarly guilty of ridiculing queer sexualities. Wreck-It Ralph notoriously includes an allusion to a gay slur directed at an effeminate villain and Toy Story 3 presents its Ken Doll character as the ultimate gay stereotype — a fashion-obsessed "metrosexual" who loves disco, campy clothing and wearing Barbie's clothes. His effeminate appearance, demeanor, and mannerisms are persistently mocked by the other toys, thereby sending the message that men who violate gender norms are worthy of ridicule.

While Toy Story 3 includes jokes about Ken stealing Barbie's scarf and even wearing her high heels, Disney's Aladdin, Robin Hood, The Emperor's New Groove, and Lilo and Stitch all include attempts for laughs at the expense of men attempting to pass as women. In protesting the transphobic, cross-dressing based sitcom Work It—which ran on ABC, a network owned by Disney—GLAAD issued a statement pointing out how such jokes "invite the audience to laugh at ... men trying to adopt a feminine appearance," thereby "giving license to similar treatment of transgender women."

At the same time that Disney films avoid presenting openly queer sexuality, particularly as anything more than a punchline, the company doesn't shy away from attempts to profit from queer consumers. Disney plays host to the independently organized "Gay Days," the so-called "world's most popular gay and lesbian celebration" that brings some 150,000 queer families to the Magic Kingdom each year. But if money is what Disney is after, the profits of Archie Comics' foray into queer representations should have its execs seeing dollar signs. When Kevin Keller's character debuted in 2010, the issue was so in demand that it led to Archie Comics' first-ever second printing. Even amid protests by the conservative group One Million Moms, the company's 2011 issue featuring Kevin's weddingalso sold out, fetching prices up to $60 on Amazon. It would be surprising if its upcoming issue featuring Kevin and Devon's much talked about kiss doesn't follow suit.

According to Archie Comics, the company decided to include Kevin's character as an attempt to keep up with the times. The CEO of Archie Comics, Jon Goldwater, has said that presenting queer characters and their plights helps the comic series stay current with "what's happening outside our windows and in our homes." Indeed, queer visibility is consistently becoming a part of mainstream culture, such that President Obama recently—and ever so subtly—recognized same-sex couples in his commencement speech at Morehouse College. Yet even when the U.S. president openly supports gay marriage, 6 in 10 Americans say they have a gay friend, and the majority of Americans themselves approve of same-sex marriage, openly gay characters remain absent from the "wonderful world of Disney." In signs of a clear demand for queer representations, many Disney fans have taken it upon themselves to queer their favorite Disney characters, creating portrayals of Disney same-sex kisses, reimaginings of Disney heroes as gay male models and even queerings of the most heterosexual of Disney tales.

"There have been characters on [the] Disney Channel who I think people have thought were gay," said Gary Marsh, president and chief creative officer of the Disney Channel. But that's all Disney feels it owes viewers: "[It's] for the audience to interpret," said Marsh, shaking off any role or responsibility in providing gay visibility.

This kind of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" philosophy of sexuality is a drastically different approach from that of Archie Comics, which recognizes and respects the significance — monetarily or otherwise — of presenting openly gay characters. "If Archie continued on in a bubble of nostalgia, [the series would] run the risk of becoming an anachronism," said Goldwater.

Amid the country's growing acceptance of queer sexualities, becoming irrelevant is a risk that the Walt Disney Company appears fully prepared to take.


This piece was originally published on Policy Mic.

by Renee Davidson
View profile »

Still Reading? Sign up for our Weekly Reader!

8 Comments Have Been Posted


... is not a Disney movie.

Thanks for the catch!

I deleted the reference to Shrek in this post. It was a Dreamworks Production, not Disney.


Not that it helps, but the character of Wiggins in Pocahontas is clearly an over-the-top effeminate male. He's the bad guy's henchman, and not evil - more of an anarchy character - and as I recall he sides with the good guys in the end. But he's definitely not a hero or role model, he's ineffective, and comic relief. Your point about Disney is absolutely right.

I don't think Disney has

I don't think Disney has anything to do with organizing or supporting Gay Days, apart from not actually banning them. From the Times article you linked: "Disney has never officially sanctioned Gay Days and has asked employees to treat the first Saturday in June just like any other day".

Obviously they still make a healthy profit from them, though. Convenient that they get the benefits of hosting the event without actually doing anything to show support for the community.

Good catch

Thanks very much for the catch. Will make that edit!

The fact that the absence of

The fact that the absence of anything not hetero can still be explained away with talk of what's "suitable" for children... Ugh.

This might sound strange, but

This might sound strange, but Disney is in some ways good to teaching acceptance in sexuality, despite its horrible lack of anything but straight hetero. In a time where my parents would get into fights over the smallest things and when everything around me changed, and I got into teenage angst and thought nobody could ever love me, Disney reminded me of True Love, and that it exists somewhere. Beyond that, it didn't tell me that True Love only exists in heterosexual people (even though that was all Disney gave us), but that True Love could come from anywhere, between anyone (a royal married a commoner, a mermaid fell for a human, a beautiful woman and a monstrous man broke the curse by loving their insides). When I was little, that was what I thought, "True Love exists! I'll find someone I can find True Love with!" when I'm grown up, I don't think "I must find True Luvv with a straight white guy" or whatever, I simply want to find True Love somewhen during my life, wether it is with a man, a woman or a Commander Shepard (mmm...).

There are no words to how much I wish there was a homosexual Disney hero, especially a Disney Princess that kisses another woman to break the evil spell with True Love. I sometimes make a story up in my head about one. I guess I just wanted to say that I personally don't think Disney is hurtful to children, but they're not helpful either, in the progressive sense. Does that make sense? :/

I heard that ABC's new tv

I heard that ABC's new tv series, "The Fosters," is featuring, I guess for the first time, a pair of lesbian parents. You should check that out, you know. I would be very happy if you write about it. Thanks!

Add new comment