Screenshot: Rachel Maddow, meet Lizz Winstead. Or, um, not.

The New York Times recently ran an article on how American evangelical Christians took their anti-gay message to Uganda's very receptive audience and -- in light of Uganda's subsequent decision to execute people for being gay -- are now trying to backpedal furiously with the "Ooops! Cultural misunderstanding!" defense.

What wasn't mentioned in the article: Rachel Maddow was in front of this story a month ago. In fact, she was all over the story for a week. And yet ... not a whole lot of credit going to her for that.

I sometimes wonder if pop culture brahmins simply don't know what to do with Maddow. Here you have a woman who pontificates on the issues of the day without spouting inanities or playing second banana to the presumed, male brains on the show. Maddow is calmly comfortable with her intellect and her journalistic instincts, and she's not really going to apologize if her competence threatens a viewer. In terms of talking heads, she is sui generis.

Could this be why she's less of a coverage-leader in mainstream media? Or does it have something to do with the numbers? Maddow is frequently second to her counterpart on FOX (alternately O'Reilly or Hannity) and O'Reilly does manage to set media agendas in a way that Maddow hasn't been able to yet?

Two other talking-head shows that have done tremendously well in leading -- and getting credit for leading -- news coverage? The Daily Show and the Colbert Report. I briefly thought, "Maybe Maddow needs to loop [Daily Show co-creator] Lizz Winstead into her production team and add a bit of pop culture contagion." She's got the formula down -- a hybrid of facts and entertainment.

Except that sort of undermines Maddow's appeal, which is that she really feels no need to neutralize her brains and focus with a goofy entertainment act. Why, do you think, is gravitas so unsettling to media professionals and consumers?

by Lisa Schmeiser
View profile »

Still Reading? Sign up for our Weekly Reader!

4 Comments Have Been Posted

ok so i've noticed that the

ok so i've noticed that the average american watches fox guys who lie, cry, lie, stage fake killings of democrats, lie, bend facts, lie, and lie some more.

how in the hell do tv people with scruples get ratings when they talk about issues truthfully?

They have a history

I know this is a late comment for this entry ( and I have no purses to sell). I just wanted to point out that Rachel Maddow's first show on Air America was "Unfiltered" with cohosts Lizz Winstwad and Chuck D. It was a great show.

Winstwad quit when the station promised their time slot to Jerry Springer. Maddow stayed on and accepted an evening slot, and they renamed the show "The Rachel Maddow Show". Just thought that was relevant to an article that mentions both of them.

Ugh, typos

Apparently my iPhone editor likes to substitute the word Winstwad for Winstead. Sorry!

Add new comment